1. My teaching style is very descriptive and detailed. I do not only try to cover topics as given in the books but I tries to elucidate them in broad sense.
2. I like to explain every thing with examples whenever necessary. Explain the sections and articles of acts using the illustration or even with a basic practical examples could help the student to understand the principles of the topics v...
1. My teaching style is very descriptive and detailed. I do not only try to cover topics as given in the books but I tries to elucidate them in broad sense.
2. I like to explain every thing with examples whenever necessary. Explain the sections and articles of acts using the illustration or even with a basic practical examples could help the student to understand the principles of the topics very profoundly.
3. I can explain the descriptive answer writing easily. From proper Heading and Sub-heading too writing answers point wise for details and proper presentation along with Case laws in IRAC method, which is Issue, Rules, Application and Conclusion.
4. I feel more than happy in clearing doubts. As while teaching many students are unable to understand the complexity of law so doubt clearing sessions are very much necessary for that to happen to clear the basic principles of law. So that they could learn further without any complications.
5. I feel very energized Andy always welcome a healthy discussion as we know that Law is theoretical subjects which includes rules and provisions and the interpretation of one statement could be different and hence discussions in the subject is like it’s essence, so I always try to to be up for it.
6. I always try to read and prepare myself first about the topic or you can say that I try to complete my homework first so that I won’t face any difficulties while explanations and doubt clearing in the class.
Read more
see less