My lessons are student-led.
I start by understanding where a student is - what they already know, where the confusion is, and what they need to get out of the session. From there, I adapt. Sometimes that means explaining a concept from scratch in plain English; sometimes it means working through a problem question or past paper together; sometimes it means a bit of both.
I do not follow a fixed...
My lessons are student-led.
I start by understanding where a student is - what they already know, where the confusion is, and what they need to get out of the session. From there, I adapt. Sometimes that means explaining a concept from scratch in plain English; sometimes it means working through a problem question or past paper together; sometimes it means a bit of both.
I do not follow a fixed lesson plan. Students bring what they are working on - a topic from that week, something they are struggling with, or an assessment coming up - and we work through it together. The goal is always for the student to leave the session with a clearer understanding than when they arrived. Once I know how a student learns best, I can adapt my teaching style. Sometimes students prefer powerpoint presentations to break down topics, other times students prefer working on problem scenarios together.
I draw on my own experience as a law student and my practical legal background to make concepts feel real rather than abstract. Law can feel overwhelming, but I genuinely believe that with the right explanation, it clicks and it can actually be a subject to enjoy!
Alongside my studies, I have completed mini-pupillages with barristers at chambers and worked as a student caseworker, which means I can bring real-world legal context into our sessions. I want students to leave not just with better grades, but with genuine confidence in their ability to think and write like a lawyer.
Read more
see less